X

Hey! We highly recommend you launch this experiment in Google Chrome. It may run slower, or not at all, in other browsers.

Okay, I'll download Google Chrome I'm willing to risk it
X

Report This Experiment

X

Share with a friend

An e-mail has been sent. Thank you for sharing this Experiment!

Close

Back to All

Monster

March 18, 2009
Author:

Dean McNamee

Location:
Copenhagen, Denmark
Rate Experiment (731 ratings):
1 2 3 4 5  
From the Author:

Monster is a demonstration of what can be done with browser web standards (without Flash). A square turns to a cube, a sphere, and a monster. Realtime procedural 3d in JavaScript.

Technology:

pre3d, canvas

Comments

By Stanley Sokolow on August 24, 2010

I ran it with Chrome 5.0.375.127 in one window and Firefox 4.0b3 in another window, at the same time. Chrome ran through almost 2 iterations of the whole routine by the time Firefox ran 1. This is on an ASUS x83v notebook with Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 2.0 Ghz, 4 GB, nVidia GeForece 9300M GS GPU, Vista-64.

Reply to this comment
By ash pb on August 04, 2010

:)

Reply to this comment
By terdsak on July 21, 2010

เยี่ยม

Reply to this comment
By Erik on June 11, 2010

Works perfect in Safari 5!!

Reply to this comment
By Chrome Hound on May 21, 2010

This is amazing dood.

Reply to this comment
By Yo on April 12, 2010

Works great in Chrome!

CS, Battlefield and much more games may be on the Internet in the future and this is a great start.

Reply to this comment
By Nick on May 04, 2010

I'm pretty sure you mean "in the web browser" and not "on the internet" because they currently are on the internet at-large. :D

Reply to this comment
By Cr@ZyBoY on December 24, 2009

Works perfectly in Opera 10.5-preAlpha. I think it will kick Chrome's ass :D

Reply to this comment
By mooph on December 20, 2009

Nice, I'm interested!

mooph

Reply to this comment
By natholas on December 14, 2009

guys.. this is where the line between 3D Games and websites gets broken

Reply to this comment
By Richie on October 05, 2009

HTML 5 and Google will rule the web... This is frickin wicked.... Love you guys.... transcending simple reality. WHOOOO!

Reply to this comment
By Addy on October 02, 2009

I'm just hear to say great job to all the Chrome Experiment developers who came up with these excellent demos. I've coded many of my own showcased elsewhere, but I wanted to add in my two cents to some of the comments going on above...

Take a moment to remember what the name of the site you are on is called..its CHROMEexperiments. Not Firefoxexperiments or InternetExplorerExperiments but CHROMEexperiments ... making comments about any of these demos working or not working in IE is just plain stupid.

Anyone that knows anything about HTML5 and the canvas tag are WELL aware that IE doesn't currently support 99% of the canvas demos out there. If you come here dont troll..simply appreciate that what is being done is ground-breaking because it doesn't need OpenGL, Flash, DirectX or anything other than the canvas tag to work from within your browser.

Reply to this comment
By Frank on August 29, 2009

Pretty cool, but it lags like hell. Thinks that is a problem of "Shiretoko" 3.5 ( I don't know why but it seems like i can only install firefox 3.0.1 in ubuntu, my mother uses winDOS and she can install 3.5 w/o any problems *doh* )

Shiretoko lies at 14% of processor usage, and it lags?!?!

Google, Please port Chrome to Ubuntu!

Reply to this comment
By Frank on August 29, 2009

Okay, Now I've found out that I can install Chromium on Linux, Quite nice w/ the themes. But it crashed 2 mins after first launch...

----

Runs pretty smooth and cool blur! It doesn't even lag at all in Chromium!

Reply to this comment
By rakesh on August 11, 2009

bad box creation.....try adding more

Reply to this comment
By visitor on August 09, 2009

can't believe some of these people don't appreciate such fine work at all. just look at the code. this is a proof of concept, not transformers. this is great work!

Reply to this comment
By Namit on August 03, 2009

ankit

Reply to this comment
By M. Evans on July 26, 2009

At first mesmerizing and a little creepy. But after about 30 seconds-1 minute it got a little boring.

Reply to this comment
By c. k. may on July 25, 2009

i would like this very much.

Reply to this comment
By Jonas Almeida on July 20, 2009

Fantastic!!! :-) :-)

This is a very compelling argument to start refusing to download any (client side) GUI applications: from canvas/HTML5 onwards there are no graphics the browser cannot produce. Maybe this will convince Mathworks to come up with tools that assist loyal Matlab users like myself to port their algorithms to the web without requiring MCR ...

Reply to this comment
By beverice on July 20, 2009

everyone saying this sucks..look into his work and stop complaining i dont see you doing // (c) 2009 Dean McNamee. Not yet released / licensed.

Soft3d=(function(){function aG(aK,aJ){if(aKaJ){return aK}return aJ}function ay(aK,aJ,aL){return aG(aJ,t(aK,aL))}var h=Math.PI*2;function ax(aK,aJ){return{x:aK.y*aJ.z-aK.z*aJ.y,y:aK.z*aJ.x-aK.x*aJ.z,z:aK.x*aJ.y-aK.y*aJ.x}}function aE(aK,aJ){return aK.x*aJ.x+aK.y*aJ.y}function ao(aK,aJ){return aK.x*aJ.x+aK.y*aJ.y+aK.z*aJ.z}function u(aK,aJ){return{x:aK.x-aJ.x,y:aK.y-aJ.y}}function b(aK,aJ){return{x:aK.x-aJ.x,y:aK.y-aJ.y,z:aK.z-aJ.z}}function z(aL,aK,aJ){aL.x=aK.x-aJ.x;aL.y=aK.y-aJ.y;return aL}function C(aL,aK,aJ){aL.x=aK.x-aJ.x;aL.y=aK.y-aJ.y;aL.z=aK.z-aJ.z;return aL}function a(aK,aJ){return{x:aK.x+aJ.x,y:aK.y+aJ.y}}function aD(aK,aJ){return{x:aK.x+aJ.x,y:aK.y+aJ.y,z:aK.z+aJ.z}}function aa(aL,aK,aJ){aL.x=aK.x+aJ.x;aL.y=aK.y+aJ.y;return aL}function ab(aL,aK,aJ){aL.x=aK.x+aJ.x;aL.y=aK.y+aJ.y;aL.z=aK.z+aJ.z;return aL}function aq(aJ,aK){return{x:aJ.x*aK,y:aJ.y*aK}}function ae(aJ,aK){return{x:aJ.x*aK,y:aJ.y*aK,z:aJ.z*aK}}function al(aJ){var aL=aJ.x,aK=aJ.y;return Math.sqrt(aL*aL+aK*aK)}function X(aJ){var aM=aJ.x,aL=aJ.y,aK=aJ.z;return Math.sqrt(aM*aM+aL*aL+aK*aK)}function am(aJ){return aq(aJ,1/al(aJ))}function Z(aJ){return ae(aJ,1/X(aJ))}function aA(aT,aR,aQ,aP,aO,aN,aM,aL,aK,aJ,aU,aS){this.e0=aT;this.e1=aR;this.e2=aQ;this.e3=aP;this.e4=aO;this.e5=aN;this.e6=aM;this.e7=aL;this.e8=aK;this.e9=aJ;this.e10=aU;this.e11=aS}function J(aJ,aK){return{x:aJ.e0*aK.x+aJ.e1*aK.y+aJ.e2*aK.z+aJ.e3,y:aJ.e4*aK.x+aJ.e5*aK.y+aJ.e6*aK.z+aJ.e7,z:aJ.e8*aK.x+aJ.e9*aK.y+aJ.e10*aK.z+aJ.e11}}function Q(be,bd){var bi=be.e0,bh=be.e1,bg=be.e2,bf=be.e3,bc=be.e4,bb=be.e5;var ba=be.e6,aY=be.e7,aW=be.e8,aV=be.e9,aS=be.e10,aQ=be.e11;var aU=bd.e0,aT=bd.e1,aR=bd.e2,aP=bd.e3,aO=bd.e4,aN=bd.e5;var aM=bd.e6,aL=bd.e7,aK=bd.e8,aJ=bd.e9,aZ=bd.e10,aX=bd.e11;return new aA(bi*aU+bh*aO+bg*aK,bi*aT+bh*aN+bg*aJ,bi*aR+bh*aM+bg*aZ,bi*aP+bh*aL+bg*aX+bf,bc*aU+bb*aO+ba*aK,bc*aT+bb*aN

Reply to this comment
By mactrac on July 18, 2009

Muy Muy bueno me gusta creo que es muy buena

(Very Very Good i like it i think it is very good)

I know i couldnt make anything like it. and any of this on the site

Reply to this comment
By Mauro Sciuto on July 10, 2009

mi piace (i like it)

Reply to this comment
By XLR8TR on July 07, 2009

this sucks so badly

Reply to this comment
By Antar on July 17, 2009

Perhaps , you can design something better ??

Reply to this comment
By nana on July 02, 2009

good

Reply to this comment
By markknight on June 30, 2009

That was very interesting to see a image change so many times.

Reply to this comment
By weise on June 30, 2009

very nice.

Reply to this comment
By Andrei on June 16, 2009

This opens up a whole new perspective on web design if the ones cursing this did not figure it out. finally js is faster then a crippled slug. js means better web experience and less server loads. since netscape invented it and then micro$cr0tum ripped it off there has never been such a massive web revolution. i bet this will spawn a whole new generation of websites as no doubt google guys predicted it.

Reply to this comment
By ghost of delete key on August 12, 2009

Heh, it's something like finally being able to use a garage full of great tools left to you by a crazy uncle, only to discover he was an alien from the future :p

Reply to this comment
By peter Cohn on June 08, 2009

what a pile of sh*t

Reply to this comment
By Josh on June 14, 2009

I would have to disagree completely. This is very good example of how much computer hardware has changed in recent years. Great work on a great example!

Reply to this comment
By shivali pandya on June 07, 2009

how long did this take you?

Reply to this comment
By Haunt on June 07, 2009

Please excuse my last post, I've been the last few javascript years on a remote island.

Thank you very much for creating this demo.

Reply to this comment
By Haunt on June 05, 2009

hm, if I rightclick it, I can display single png images. Could this be just a script to exchange frames?

Reply to this comment
By jonno on July 10, 2009

How about u right clik dumbo

Reply to this comment
By jonno on July 10, 2009

Then read the source-code

Reply to this comment
By shami on June 04, 2009

Fabulous

Reply to this comment
By shivali on June 07, 2009

i agree.

Reply to this comment
By Jordan on June 04, 2009

I'd like to see the source code to this

Reply to this comment
By Zach on June 10, 2009

R-Click, veiw page source

Reply to this comment
By guido alexander waldenmeier on May 30, 2009

Still LIFE the species ;)

little bit slow but it works

apple mac os x 10.5.7

firefox 3.0.10

grettings from southwest germany

www.artguido.org

Reply to this comment
By Mike on May 29, 2009

its great, but it didn't do the morph that well in FF 3.5b5 pre. I thought it was my machine, but i did it in chrome 2b and it worked nearly flawless. Im quite surprised how far these engines have come in terms of speed. Its like this code runs as if it was native to the OS (i think that was the idea of JIT thou)

Firefox 3.5 and chrome 2 are going to put IE8 to shame.

Reply to this comment
By pierre on May 30, 2009

It's really cool to have this progress, but like native to the OS, hum.. This kind of perf is those native for the Amiga 20 years ago. So we still have a 1000 factor from what can be done native now and what the web can propose.

Reply to this comment
By kapiro on May 28, 2009

yes )

Reply to this comment
By Daniel Sader on May 27, 2009

There's an HUGE speed difference using this demo on Firefox 3.1 and Chrome. Very cool demo!

Reply to this comment
By LEO on May 27, 2009

GOOD

Reply to this comment
By LEO on May 27, 2009

HITS OK

Reply to this comment
By aivit on May 25, 2009

huwaw!!!! asteeg! ahaha!

Reply to this comment
By Deanna on May 24, 2009

that was pretty cool!

Reply to this comment
By hemant on May 25, 2009

well looks lik sum1 gt it brains n made a shitty crap outta it.... it iz eatin' a lot of memory a li'll peace of advice

F**** off

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

hemant, you're a dumbass. Learn to type.

Reply to this comment
By Hex on May 22, 2009

This looks like what people could do 10 years ago using OpenGL, with the same performance.

What's next ? JavaScript HD video decoder ? JavaScript soundcard driver ?

Reply to this comment
By pierre on May 30, 2009

You can even say 20 years ago, on amiga, atari falcon,... and without openGL

Reply to this comment
By Mike on May 21, 2009

Broken in IE8 and IE7

fail

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

Everything good on the web is broking in those browsers.

I think a better fail is the sad fact that you are using Internet Explorer.

Reply to this comment
By curtaindog on May 29, 2009

I agree, IE8 and IE7 fail

Now excuse me while I go and register iefailexperiments.com

Reply to this comment
By scott on May 22, 2009

hahaha that made me laugh

ie, that's funny...

Reply to this comment
By Alex on May 20, 2009

Yeah, it just eats 90% if my Centrino 1.8ghz CPU :D

Reply to this comment
By Your mom on May 19, 2009

god dam ie 5

Reply to this comment
By Anubis on May 17, 2009

Hey, this is a video only, not real JavaScript demo :(

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

It is ironic that your name sounds like "noob".

That is what you are.

Right click, view the source. If you knew anything about canvas, you would know that this is a legitimate demo.

Reply to this comment
By dude on May 21, 2009

Um... actually it's not a video.

Reply to this comment
By k-meleon user on May 16, 2009

Extremely slow in K-Meleon 1.5.3...

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

HAhahaha

What on earth did you expect??

Reply to this comment
By router on May 11, 2009

i noticed that in chrome i get 10% less CPU usage

btw i did not know javascript can do anything like that it's awesome

Reply to this comment
By Maxine on May 11, 2009

its really but would be cooler if you could move it with your mouse

Reply to this comment
By Navin on May 10, 2009

IS this a addon to google chrome .. how can one make use of this .. ..i didnt get what experiment means to us .. is that they have developed it through google chrome .. is that the thing

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

No, this example (and most of the examples) use the HTML5 "canvas" element, and it's associated drawing APIs. It is available in all browsers except Internet Explorer, but Chrome is the fastest to render.

Reply to this comment
By denis on May 05, 2009

cool

Reply to this comment
By henn on April 25, 2009

i wanna try base on there comment

Reply to this comment
By Rad on April 25, 2009

Flash is more efficient and works across a broad range of platforms. I hate installing a million different plug-ins!

Reply to this comment
By Liam on May 09, 2009

flash is horribly slow on macs & takes up all the cpu

Reply to this comment
By Andrey Fedorov on May 01, 2009

> I hate installing a million different plug-ins!

Flash is a plugin. This demo is JavaScript - not a plugin.

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

Thanks, I was about to rant.

These demos are proof of concept. Using the new canvas and audio elements we will be able to completely replace the proprietary plug-in-based Adobe Flash "platform". Hoorah!

Reply to this comment
By Bob on July 28, 2009

Maybe, it will open the door to get paid more as a Javascript developer, who knows....

Reply to this comment
By Bob on July 28, 2009

Nothing wrong with Flash, if you know how to use it. Besides it has made me a ton of dough :)

Reply to this comment
By zeljko on April 18, 2009

ovo je neverovatno!!!

Reply to this comment
By Andrew on April 18, 2009

I really hope people start using Javascript instead of flash now

Reply to this comment
By Sukhi on June 11, 2009

That will never happen... flash is way more productive and you know what it runs in FF IE and CH :)

JS u have to make different ver for every other browser but fash is just one platform.

So would i make this example in JS never! would i use JS for other UI , obviously

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

You are actually incorrect. JavaScript runs nearly identically on all browsers. The DOM, however, differs wildly. In the case of these demos, the programming required to make what you see on the screen is of similar complexity to an equivalent ActionScript/Flash creation. JavaScript and canvas are changing the way we look at the web, Flash is simply an annoyance.

Also, this demo is supported in all browsers but IE. Firefox included.

Reply to this comment
By willian ferreira silva on April 18, 2009

loko

Reply to this comment
By iYanni on April 17, 2009

Safari 4 Public Beta ran it well. But i cant wait for chrome to come out for mac

Reply to this comment
By jlh on April 16, 2009

this is so cool. id love this for a screen saver

Reply to this comment
By jasco on July 27, 2009

me too i really enjoy it as well

Reply to this comment
By jeevan kumart on April 16, 2009

fantastic

Reply to this comment
By Adrian on April 14, 2009

It always runs slow on firefox, but not in chrome. This should be a screensaver!

Reply to this comment
By skierpage on May 21, 2009

This demo runs fast for me on Firefox 3.5, which is in beta 4 now and probably coming out soon. The TraceMonkey JavaScript engine in FF 3.5 is much faster.

Reply to this comment
By iYanni on April 17, 2009

Safari 4 did it well

Reply to this comment
By Bob on April 28, 2009

Not at all, I tested on Safari 4 beta and it's not smooth at all, under Chrome it's always fast and smooth.

Reply to this comment
By charon on April 12, 2009

this was fun

Reply to this comment
By Mohsen on April 11, 2009

What would you recommend as a 3D JS lib for such animations ?

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

There is a link below the demo.

The frameworks that have been released so far are limited and generally do not support 3D animation. I will be releasing one in the near future.

Reply to this comment
By Sreevisnu on April 11, 2009

its a very nice amimation

Reply to this comment
By Peter Thompson on April 09, 2009

Runs (albeit slowly) on my 1.67GHz G4 Powerbook using Safari Version 4 Public Beta (4528.16).

Reply to this comment
By Ryan on April 09, 2009

Very nice-looking, but it still pegs the CPU as bad as flash. Maybe that's just the cost of using software- instead of GPU-based rendering though?

Reply to this comment
By Kishore Kumar on April 07, 2009

cool buddy

Reply to this comment
By Bc316 on April 02, 2009

I don't get it

Reply to this comment
By Tiago Faustino on April 01, 2009

Awesome!!! One day I can do this!

Reply to this comment
By eric on April 03, 2009

would like to learn

Reply to this comment
By spamspam on April 01, 2009

How do you actually draw something to the browser window? I can understand all the rest.

Reply to this comment
By TFk on April 02, 2009

They're using the HTML5 canvas tag.

Reply to this comment
By Ben M on March 29, 2009

Great Demo, though for some reason this ran pretty slow for me using Firefox in Ubuntu 9.04....

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

Same, though it was perfectly fast on my Mac. Firefox on Ubuntu is notoriously slow.

Reply to this comment
By bambangp on March 28, 2009

wow, very impressive.. :D I thought 3D rendering only works at flash, but this is real javascript...

such a good job, we're waiting for more example :)

Reply to this comment
By TheOne&Only... on March 27, 2009

OMG... That looks cool. But really, what's the point of it. And .... they say I needed a HTML5 thingy majiber... that sucks :( I really wanted to see what it does.

Reply to this comment
By Luke Berry on April 17, 2009

What browser do you use? I am betting you are using IE to do this.

Chrome, Safari, Opera and Firefox all support the HTML5 Canvas Tag.

Reply to this comment
By Highvolt on March 27, 2009

Awesome with Safari 4

Reply to this comment
By kombizz on March 27, 2009

What is the application in photography or otherfields?

Reply to this comment
By cherish on March 26, 2009

try and get inside my head . many have tried and have faild .

Reply to this comment
By Paul Reiber on March 26, 2009

tiddly-rific! one step away from perfect.

Reply to this comment
By TiddlyWikiGuy on March 26, 2009

javascript is as javascript does.

Reply to this comment
By charles on March 25, 2009

Food for thought, but, let's get a generic/cut down version that works with sufficient performance on all browsers.

Reply to this comment
By ghost of delete key on August 12, 2009

That's junk food. This is exploration of new abilities. Today's Chrome will be tomorrow's IE, when something Crome-ier comes along. Let's get used to using newly supported tags/ APIs, and allow Mozilla et al to join the Jurassic menagerie as nature intended!

Reply to this comment
By mirta on March 25, 2009

quiero verlo en español latinoamericano

Reply to this comment
By Paul Reiber on March 26, 2009

its not about what language, it's about what it does. Tambien quiero ver todo de esto en espanol latinoamericano - y con su ayuda podemos hacerlo!

Reply to this comment
By russianrick on March 23, 2009

It makes for quite an impressive comparison between Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox, as this same experiment ran in Firefox, but much slower. I was monitoring my processor at the time and it loaded both my cores pretty heavy 70+%. Is it possible to make things like this hit my GPU more than the CPU? That is what my dedicated video card is for.

Reply to this comment
By apexskier on March 26, 2009

I think that's what snow leopard (the next mac os) is supposed to do, but with all applications.

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

True!

Also, this demo uses the getContext2d method, and then builds a 3D library on top. Once we have support for the getContext3d method (and subsequent 3D API), the majority of the work will be done by the graphics card.

Reply to this comment
By Graig on March 23, 2009

imagine if it used multiple cores. pretty cool.

Reply to this comment
By Benny Lam on March 23, 2009

Thanks for an amazing demo on what Javascript can do for 3D.

Questions for thinking.

1. To render a real interesting scene on browser, will the Javascript bloats to the size of an 3D browser plug-in like unity.

http://unity3d.com/gallery/live-demos/tropical-paradise

2. If yes, will it be downloaded faster than a 3d plug-in.

3. If the download is slow than a 3d plug-in installation, what is the advantage of developing 3D JS library except it is opensource and conforming to standards.

p.s. I don't have any connection or interest with Unity. Just an interested user on 3d game engine.

Benny

Reply to this comment
By Jason on July 09, 2009

The interested part of JavaScript is that programmers tend to be very pickier about what makes it into the final product. You will find that the 3D libraries that come out will be faster than the current Flash implementations. Also, with JavaScript, the library can be hosted on a 3rd party site, so you only have to download it once and then every site can use the cached version.

Reply to this comment
By Corinna on March 21, 2009

Wow - the best example to date of how superior Chrome's JS interpreter is to other browsers (including some also using webkit). Opera 9.5 on Vista 32 was the closest to Chrome's performance. This is amazing, I had to right click to make sure it wasn't Flash or Silverlight. Excellent job, and thanks for raising the bar so much higher!

Reply to this comment
By bob on April 28, 2009

For me Opera 9.x and 10.x alpha was terribly slow. Firefox 3.5 and Safari were much better and very close to each other. Chrome on the other hand is the only one that runs the animation very smoothly all the time. (PS it didn't work in any version of IE).

Reply to this comment
By Necromas on March 21, 2009

Would make a good screensaver.

Reply to this comment
By Alex on March 20, 2009

Wow. awesome! Is there any reusable code/ tutorial on this?

Reply to this comment
By Juan David Hincapie on March 20, 2009

Hi dean, thanks for the demo. It's really cool! Have you got any library or other piece of reusable code? How about the modelling? Greetings from the IT University of Copenhagen.

Reply to this comment
By Andrew on March 20, 2009

I like these negative comments (not). They're hilarious.

The issue of framerate:

* get a PC that's not more than a year old, I get at least 30 fps

The issue of quality:

* personally I'm amazed at the lack of aliasing as well as the transparency (shaders in js? lol, not) affects

This is amazing! This points to an interesting future of in-browser 3d applications.

Reply to this comment
By sci on March 31, 2009

+1

Reply to this comment
By bob on April 28, 2009

+1

The motion blur effect is just amazing!

Reply to this comment
By cowl on March 20, 2009

why is it that the only ones that give firefox any difficulty are in html5?

Reply to this comment
By Neo on March 19, 2009

okay, my computer is slow.

Reply to this comment
By Aleksi on March 19, 2009

Simply awesome! :) Reminds me of some of the late 90s demoscene, time when i were still hanging around there :)

I really got to figure out how to do this stuff, it's awesome!

Aleksi / NuCode.fi

Reply to this comment
By Ian Wojtowicz on March 19, 2009

Is this based on a 3D library that we can use?

Reply to this comment
By Eirik on March 19, 2009

Wow, it's truly amazing that google can now render a 3d cube at almost 5 frames per second. We sure have come a long way since the 80s!

Reply to this comment
By bob on April 28, 2009

I think you should upgrade your 386sx @25MHz...

Reply to this comment
By mk on March 19, 2009

Got it, the video player was obstructing "i'm ready to risk" button.

Reply to this comment
By mk on March 19, 2009

how to run on firefox in Ubuntu???

it says this is not available for your browser. How to work around that? please

Reply to this comment
By Paul C on March 19, 2009

I managed to get this to work on Chrome Lite on my T-Mobile G1! It has a slow redraw rate, especially at the end but it's really cool!!!

Reply to this comment
By chenda on March 19, 2009

adipoli monee....superb

Reply to this comment
By v12aml on March 19, 2009

working fine in my macbook with safari4 beta

Reply to this comment
By Owen Savill on March 19, 2009

Works in Opera too :-)

Reply to this comment
By Nelethill on March 19, 2009

Only works fine with Chrome!!!

Reply to this comment
By I.M. Boring on March 19, 2009

Purdy

Reply to this comment
By Alpay on March 19, 2009

Kills my MBP on FF3. Safari4 plays nicely though...

http://unofficialmac.com

http://durumbu.com

Reply to this comment
By mech on March 19, 2009

Really impressive... so fast with Chrome!

Great job with this demo.

Reply to this comment
By Jordan Koppole on March 19, 2009

awesome man.. Excellent

Reply to this comment
By shouta on March 19, 2009

coooooollllll!!!!!!

Reply to this comment
By mico on March 19, 2009

Unbelievable what can be achieved with excellent knowledge of 3D math and JavaScript. 10/10

Reply to this comment
By darkSnow on March 19, 2009

cool!!!!!!!!!~!~!

Reply to this comment
By hirva on March 19, 2009

really amazing!!!

Reply to this comment
By jim on March 19, 2009

cool !!!

Reply to this comment
By Eric on March 19, 2009

and it's javascript...

wow!

Reply to this comment
By wvdburgt on March 19, 2009

Runs sweet in safari 4 on a iMac. Looks awsome. I wish there where more of these kind of things.

Reply to this comment
By Graham on March 18, 2009

Amazing on FF 3.0.7 too. I'm going be pulling apart the code for this to see how it's done (another great thing about javascript).

Reply to this comment
By Californian on March 18, 2009

I wish I could set this as my background (or screensaver)!

Reply to this comment
By Tim Buckner on August 16, 2009

nice

Reply to this comment
By BC316 on April 02, 2009

Yeah, this would be a wicked screen saver!!

Reply to this comment
By Sergio Montoya on March 18, 2009

Realmente asombroso (really awesome)

Reply to this comment
By Ryan Alexander on March 18, 2009

awesome. demoscene style :)

Reply to this comment

Add a comment

All fields are required to prevent spam.